Wednesday, November 7, 2007 at 9:25 AM | 0 comments  

I enjoy Rob Zombie’s music (saw him at the Nissan Pavilion in ’06), I enjoyed his last two movies (“House of 1000 Corpses” and “Devil’s Rejects”), but unfortunately I did not enjoy his reinvisioning of John Carpenter’s “Halloween”. Rob Zombie chose to recast a number of the players from his previous films, who honestly aren’t that good, and interject some of his trademark manic and dark humor in instances where it really wasn’t necessary. Zombie refused to refer to this film as a “remake”, as he swore it would be its own entity and his own vision of the Michael Myers story. However, after the halfway point, what we’re left with is pretty much the original film only compressed to half the time with shallower characters and a less-talented cast. Zombie can call his version of the film whatever he likes, but at the end of the day, it’s still a remake. And not a very good one, at that.

Michael Myers (Daeg Faerch) is a troubled little ten year-old. His family life is a wreck, the kids at school bully him, he has an Oedipus Complex going on with his mother (Sheri Moon Zombie) and in his spare time he enjoys torturing small animals. Is it really any surprise when little Michael snaps and goes on a killing spree, leaving only his infant sister and mother alive? Michael is committed to the Smith’s Grove Sanitarium and placed under the care of Dr. Samuel Loomis (Malcolm McDowell). As Michael grows older he gradually draws deeper into himself until what’s left is hardly human at all. Halloween, seventeen years later, a larger and more menacing Michael (Tyler Mane) escapes from Smith’s Grove and carves a path of destruction leading back to his hometown of Haddenfield. Michael intends to find his sister, Laurie (Scout Taylor-Compton), and only Loomis can hope to save her from certain death.

The first half of the film is a detailed look at Michael’s childhood, from the events which lead to him going nuts to his days festering in Smith’s Grove. I felt Zombie’s style of directing as well as some very poor cast choices pretty much killed the entire act. The scenes where Michael’s mom is being menaced by her deadbeat alcoholic husband come off far more humorous than depressing or uncomfortable, sending the audience into fits of laughter. You don’t feel a thing for Michael and it sets a very poor tone for the entire movie. Sheri Moon Zombie is completely devoid of anything even approaching acting talent, so in compensation Zombie inexplicably makes her a stripper. As hot as she is, I don’t go to movie theaters to jerk off (that’s what got Pee Wee Herman in trouble, after all), so all her exotic dancing is pretty much meaningless.

This “origin” for Michael is what I assume Zombie meant as his “reinvisioning”. Where-as Carpenter simply made Michael out to be a normal kid with a normal family who snapped without notice, Zombie spares no time showing us that Michael was a sick little monster long before he killed anybody. I typically don’t mind remakes that take their own unique approach to characters and origins (Michael’s origin had already been screwed up in previous films like “Halloween 6”), and I might have liked this backstory had Zombie not felt obligated to shoehorn his feather-brained wife into such a prominent role or added humor to scenes that needed to make us feel for the character, not laugh at him.

Malcolm McDowell adds a touch of class to the flick and plays a very good Loomis. Obviously, Donald Pleasance will forever own the character, but McDowell does a splendid job regardless. The scenes with him trying to interact with young Michael at the sanitarium were the best moments in the first half and flesh Loomis out as more than an obsessive lunatic determined to kill his former patient.

The second half of the film is basically the original “Halloween” compressed into an hour or so. It follows the original film’s layout pretty much identically save for the climax, where Zombie adds his own touch to things. I think what bugged me most about all of this was that for some reason Zombie felt that every character should say “fuck” at least a half dozen times. I’m no prude when it comes to foul language, but the amount of pointless cursing in this movie made the whole flick look downright juvenile.

Laurie’s friends are killed off almost as quickly as they’re introduced and the kids like Tommy Doyal (Skyler Gisondo) are pretty much only there because they were in the original film. One of my favorite character actors, Brad Dourif (Chucky from “Child’s Play”), makes it in as Sheriff Brackett, but the entire second half of the movie tries to fit so much in such limited space that his part is fairly unremarkable. Honestly, the entire second half is just one kill after another with little to no characterization for anybody but Michael and Loomis.

I’m not positive if I liked the ending or not. I’m relieved that it deviated from the original’s, but at the same time felt it was entirely soulless. And that’s probably what best describes Rob Zombie’s version of “Halloween”, soulless.

Posted by coolpix Labels:
Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:31 PM | 1 comments  

Even though they killed him off in Saw III, the latest installment in Lionsgate's hit horror franchise -- directed by Darren Lynn Bousman from a screenplay by Patrick Melton & Marcus Dunstan -- offers fans the chance to see what turned engineer John Kramer (Tobin Bell) into the maniacal Jigsaw. While it's not a franchise reboot-origin story a la Casino Royale, Saw IV delves deeper into the character and motivations of its central protagonist far more than the previous entries did.

Besides Jigsaw, Saw IV focuses most on SWAT Commander Rigg (Lyriq Bent), who is haunted by the loss of his colleagues -- especially Detective Kerry (Dina Meyer) -- at the hands of Jigsaw. Rigg is abducted by Jigsaw's mysterious new helper and finds himself engaged in a game engineered by Jigsaw from beyond the grave. Since Rigg is obsessed with saving people, Jigsaw has set a series of interconnected traps that force Rigg to question his obsession and ask whether people must save themselves.

Rigg has 90 minutes (hey, that just so happens to be a good chunk of the film's running time!) to follow Jigsaw's clues and rescue his latest victims from their grisly traps. The catch is that these particular victims are unrepentant criminals. Can Rigg save them all in time? Should he even bother to? (There's another motivation for Rigg to complete his task before the 90 minutes expires but we're leaving that out for the sake of spoilers.)

While Rigg plays Jigsaw's game, FBI agents Strahm (Scott Patterson) and Perez (Athena Karkanis) help Rigg's boss Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) figure out what the puppet master's last game is about. Their investigation leads them to Jigsaw's ex-wife Jill (Betsy Russell), whom they suspect is involved in this new game. It's through Jill's retelling of her past that we come to learn what made John Kramer become Jigsaw.

Saw IV is even more character-driven than Saw III, which often seemed like an exercise in gore just for the sake of it. This is the most human that we've seen Jigsaw, from the opening scene on. Saw IV firmly establishes the fate of that character, and it will be interesting to see how the franchise can continue from here. Tobin Bell seems liberated from the series' trappings (no pun intended), playing John Kramer as an ordinary man with extraordinary skills who, due to tragic events in his life, finally snaps. Jigsaw ends up being the most sympathetic character in the movie, which is no small accomplishment when you consider that he's also the source of all the film's violence.

It's amazing how the filmmakers are able to keep coming up with fresh ideas for new traps, but here the traps serve as metaphors for their victims rather than just being cool and scary to behold. However, it becomes clear that regardless of how one plays the game Jigsaw (or his helper) has rigged it in his favor. This cheapens whatever moral Jigsaw is trying to teach his pawns if the deck is stacked against them.

A colleague pointed out that so much of Saw IV relies on characters making completely arbitrary decisions. If someone opted to go left instead of right then Jigsaw's entire plan could have fallen apart. It's inconceivable to think that even a puppet master as ingenious as Jigsaw could have foreseen and prepared for every possible decision that his subjects would make. (Why Rigg never calls for back-up remains a mystery.) The film ventures into Shyamalan territory by the end, a climax that we can't say too much about for the sake of spoilers suffice to say that it highlights the arbitrary nature of the story's construction. It's an ending that will frustrate as many viewers as it impresses.

Despite these shortcomings, Saw IV is a gripping, breathlessly paced thriller that will keep you engaged throughout. You may leave the cinema arguing about what it all meant and how things played out, but you'll also leave with a better understanding of Jigsaw as a character. How often has a horror sequel actually bothered to explore what makes its iconic boogeyman tick? For that reason alone Saw IV is worth a look
Posted by coolpix Labels:




Bollywood stars performed in aid of Mumbai police last night in a charity show.Riya Sen, Urmila, Kareena and Diya performed on the occasion.

Over 40 top Bollywood stars and performers were in at this mega event. Shah Rukh Khan, Amitabh Bachchan, Abhishek,Aishwarya, Kareena Kapoor, Saif Ali Khan and his kids, Ranbir Kapoor, Sonam, Urmila, Rani Mukherjee, Esha Deol, Adnan Sami, Kangana Ranaut and many many more. Here is all the action from the event
Posted by coolpix Labels: